Panorama of Emergency Medicine

PoEM is an international peer-reviewed (double-blind) independent open access journal dedicated to advancing knowledge and practice in emergency medicine.

ISSN : 3006-0966

Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Prehospital, first response & transport

2 Items

All Items

  • Clinical Deterioration Among Emergency Department Boarders: From Hallway Monitoring to a Structured Rescue System

    Background: Emergency department (ED) boarding places admitted patients in an environment designed for rapid episodic assessment rather than longitudinal inpatient surveillance. The resulting mismatch in ownership, monitoring, medication delivery, fundamental nursing care, and rescue capability creates a clinically important interval of vulnerability.

    Objective: To critically synthesize recent PubMed-indexed evidence on deterioration among adult ED boarders and translate it into a practical rescue framework.

    Methods: A targeted narrative search of PubMed was conducted for English-language publications from 1 January 2020 through 11 July 2026. Direct evidence from boarded adult populations was prioritized; supporting evidence was retained only when it informed a specific rescue-system component. Evidence was interpreted according to directness, design, consistency, confounding risk, and applicability rather than pooled statistically.

    Findings: Recent large cohorts show that longer boarding is associated with early clinical deterioration, longer subsequent hospitalization, and mortality. In a five-hospital cohort of 173,168 floor-level adult boarders, early deterioration occurred in 3.6%, with risk increasing as boarding time lengthened. Recurrent hazards include diagnostic closure, ambiguous ownership, surveillance decay, delayed or omitted treatment, unmet frailty-related needs, and unsafe temporary care environments. Evidence is strongest for the existence of harm and weakest for prospectively tested integrated rescue bundles.

    Proposed framework: The BOARD framework comprises: Begin the boarding clock and dynamic risk stratification; One accountable clinical team; Acuity-matched observation and reassessment; Rescue triggers with immediate rapid-response access; and Delivery of essential inpatient care, dignity, and hospital-wide flow escalation.

    Conclusion: Boarding should be treated as an active clinical exposure rather than passive waiting. Hospitals should simultaneously reduce boarding and protect patients who remain in the ED through explicit ownership, risk-based monitoring, uninterrupted treatment, and reliable rescue. The BOARD framework is an evidence-informed implementation model that requires prospective multicenter validation.

  • Factors Associated With Prolonged Ambulance Turnaround Time in a Large Quebec Health Network:A Two-Year Retrospective Study

    Background
    Ambulance turnaround time (TAT), defined as the interval from ambulance arrival at the emergency department (ED) to vehicle readiness for a new call, is a key performance indicator for emergency medical services (EMS). Prolonged TAT reduces ambulance availability, compromises system efficiency, and may adversely affect patient outcomes. In Quebec, performance targets require that 80% of TATs be under 35  minutes and 98% under 45 minutes.

    Objective
    This study aimed to identify factors associated with ambulance TAT exceeding 45 minutes across hospitals within the Mauricie-Centre du Quebec Integrated Health and Social Services Centre (CIUSSS MCQ) over two consecutive fiscal years.

    Methods
    A retrospective observational study was conducted using anonymized EMS operational data from the PACQSPU database. All ambulance calls recorded between April 2023 to March 2024 and April 2024 to March 2025 were analyzed. Calls with TAT >45 minutes were examined according to month, time of day, call priority, receiving hospital, and day of the week.

    Results
    Of 118 953 ambulance calls, approximately 23 to 25% exceeded the 45-minute TAT threshold in both years. Delays occurred predominantly during daytime shifts and weekdays. Priority levels P1 and P3 accounted for most delayed calls, while P0 calls showed the highest proportion of prolonged TAT. Urban hospitals, particularly the regional referral center, exhibited higher delay rates.

Latest articles

Indexing Information

PoEM News

Partnership

Journal Metrics

Meet the Board

Support for Authors

1

Getting Started

Register with journal and receive Author role. Access dashboard to begin new submission.
→
2

Complete Submission

Select language, title, section • Enter abstract, keywords, references • Upload files • Add co-authors
→
3

Review & Submit

Add optional comments for editors and suggest reviewers. Review all information and confirm submission.
→
✓

Submitted

Your submission is complete and under review
↓
✓

Published

Article successfully published
→
8

Copyediting

Review copyedited files and publication-ready versions. Provide feedback or approval through discussions.
→
7

Acceptance

Accepted manuscripts proceed to copyediting and production. Receive confirmation notifications.
→
6

Upload Revised

Upload revised files through Review tab with response to reviewers (if revisions required).
→
5

Peer Review

Receive editor's decision via email and dashboard.
→
4

Track Submission

Monitor submission status via Author Dashboard.

Support for Reviewers

1

Receive Invitation

Editors send invitation via email with manuscript details. Access via link or journal login.
→
2

Request Details

Click to access assignment details including article title, abstract, review files, and schedule.
→
3

Accept / Decline

Review submission details and privacy statement. Decide whether to accept or decline the assignment.
→
4

Read Guidelines

Review journal's specific reviewer guidelines. Guidelines remain accessible throughout the review process.
→
5

Review Manuscript

Download review files and conduct thorough review. Enter comments for editor and author.
↓
✓

Complete

Review successfully submitted
→
9

Submit Review

When satisfied with review and recommendation click Submit. Confirm submission to complete the process.
→
8

Communicate

Use Review Discussion panel to ask questions. Click Add discussion to start conversation.
→
7

Recommendation

Select recommendation from dropdown menu based on review: Accept, Revisions, Resubmit, or Decline.
→
6

Upload Files

Optionally upload marked-up copy of review file. Remember to anonymize if required by type.