Panorama of Emergency Medicine

PoEM is an international peer-reviewed (double-blind) independent open access journal dedicated to advancing knowledge and practice in emergency medicine.

ISSN : 3006-0966

Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Narrative Review

Vol. 4 No. 1 (2026): Panorama Of Emergency Medicine

Clinical Deterioration Among Emergency Department Boarders: From Hallway Monitoring to a Structured Rescue System

DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26738/poem.v4i1.25
Submitted
July 11, 2026
Published
September 15, 2026

Abstract

Background: Emergency department (ED) boarding places admitted patients in an environment designed for rapid episodic assessment rather than longitudinal inpatient surveillance. The resulting mismatch in ownership, monitoring, medication delivery, fundamental nursing care, and rescue capability creates a clinically important interval of vulnerability.

Objective: To critically synthesize recent PubMed-indexed evidence on deterioration among adult ED boarders and translate it into a practical rescue framework.

Methods: A targeted narrative search of PubMed was conducted for English-language publications from 1 January 2020 through 11 July 2026. Direct evidence from boarded adult populations was prioritized; supporting evidence was retained only when it informed a specific rescue-system component. Evidence was interpreted according to directness, design, consistency, confounding risk, and applicability rather than pooled statistically.

Findings: Recent large cohorts show that longer boarding is associated with early clinical deterioration, longer subsequent hospitalization, and mortality. In a five-hospital cohort of 173,168 floor-level adult boarders, early deterioration occurred in 3.6%, with risk increasing as boarding time lengthened. Recurrent hazards include diagnostic closure, ambiguous ownership, surveillance decay, delayed or omitted treatment, unmet frailty-related needs, and unsafe temporary care environments. Evidence is strongest for the existence of harm and weakest for prospectively tested integrated rescue bundles.

Proposed framework: The BOARD framework comprises: Begin the boarding clock and dynamic risk stratification; One accountable clinical team; Acuity-matched observation and reassessment; Rescue triggers with immediate rapid-response access; and Delivery of essential inpatient care, dignity, and hospital-wide flow escalation.

Conclusion: Boarding should be treated as an active clinical exposure rather than passive waiting. Hospitals should simultaneously reduce boarding and protect patients who remain in the ED through explicit ownership, risk-based monitoring, uninterrupted treatment, and reliable rescue. The BOARD framework is an evidence-informed implementation model that requires prospective multicenter validation.

Most read articles by the same author(s)

Latest articles

Indexing Information

PoEM News

Partnership

Journal Metrics

Meet the Board

Support for Authors

1

Getting Started

Register with journal and receive Author role. Access dashboard to begin new submission.
→
2

Complete Submission

Select language, title, section • Enter abstract, keywords, references • Upload files • Add co-authors
→
3

Review & Submit

Add optional comments for editors and suggest reviewers. Review all information and confirm submission.
→
✓

Submitted

Your submission is complete and under review
↓
✓

Published

Article successfully published
→
8

Copyediting

Review copyedited files and publication-ready versions. Provide feedback or approval through discussions.
→
7

Acceptance

Accepted manuscripts proceed to copyediting and production. Receive confirmation notifications.
→
6

Upload Revised

Upload revised files through Review tab with response to reviewers (if revisions required).
→
5

Peer Review

Receive editor's decision via email and dashboard.
→
4

Track Submission

Monitor submission status via Author Dashboard.

Support for Reviewers

1

Receive Invitation

Editors send invitation via email with manuscript details. Access via link or journal login.
→
2

Request Details

Click to access assignment details including article title, abstract, review files, and schedule.
→
3

Accept / Decline

Review submission details and privacy statement. Decide whether to accept or decline the assignment.
→
4

Read Guidelines

Review journal's specific reviewer guidelines. Guidelines remain accessible throughout the review process.
→
5

Review Manuscript

Download review files and conduct thorough review. Enter comments for editor and author.
↓
✓

Complete

Review successfully submitted
→
9

Submit Review

When satisfied with review and recommendation click Submit. Confirm submission to complete the process.
→
8

Communicate

Use Review Discussion panel to ask questions. Click Add discussion to start conversation.
→
7

Recommendation

Select recommendation from dropdown menu based on review: Accept, Revisions, Resubmit, or Decline.
→
6

Upload Files

Optionally upload marked-up copy of review file. Remember to anonymize if required by type.