Panorama of Emergency Medicine

PoEM is an international peer-reviewed (double-blind) independent open access journal dedicated to advancing knowledge and practice in emergency medicine.

ISSN : 3006-0966

Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Editorial

Vol. 4 No. 1 (2026): Panorama Of Emergency Medicine

Therapeutic hypothermia may improve neurological outcome of cardiac arrest in adults

DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26738/poem.v4i1.4
Submitted
February 24, 2026
Published
April 27, 2026

Abstract

Source: Arrich J, Schütz N, Oppenauer J et al. (2023) Hypothermia for neuroprotection in adults after cardiac arrest. Cochrane
Database Syst Rev. 2023 May 22;5(5):CD004128. http://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD004128.pub5

Context
Neurological prognosis after resuscitated cardiac arrest is challenging to determine. Early resuscitation is essential for a favorable outcome. Experimental studies suggest that therapeutic hypothermia (TH) may have beneficial effects, and several clinical trials have investigated this intervention.

Clinical question
What are the benefits and harms of TH (target temperature 32–34 °C) in adults after resuscitated cardiac arrest, compared with standard treatment?

Bottom Line
TH may be associated with better neurological outcome than standard treatment, even at a maintained temperature of 36 °C (low level of evidence). Subgroup analyses indicate that TH offers better chances of neurological recovery than no cooling or fever prevention (temperature >36 °C) (low level of evidence). In contrast, data do not suggest a difference between TH and fever control or temperature management at 36 °C (low level of evidence). Regarding survival at short, medium, and long-term follow-up, TH shows little or no difference compared with standard treatment, with or without active cooling to 36 °C (low level of evidence). Concerning adverse effects, TH may lead to a slight increase in the incidence of pneumonia and severe arrhythmia (low level of evidence). Evidence is very uncertain regarding the effect of TH on the risk of hypokalaemia (very low level of evidence). Two studies assessed quality of life at six months, but the evidence was insufficient to draw conclusions.

Caveats
Several sources of bias were identified in the included studies; two studies were considered at high risk of bias. Standard cooling methods were employed in all studies, such as ice packs or cooling pads. Only one study used hemofiltration, but its data could not be pooled with the others.
Further research is needed to develop optimal cooling protocols, clarify the timing of TH initiation, and determine the target temperature and dose response effects.

Author contributions
All authors contributed equally and validated the final version of record.
Acknowledgments
This editorial is a summary of a systematic review previously published in the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (see https://www.cochranelibrary.com/ for more information). This summary is prepared in coordination with Patricia Jabre, Daniel Meyran, Julie Dumouchel, Yannick Auffret, Nordine Nekhili, Nicolas Cazes, Aurélien Renard et Tania Marx from the Cochrane Pre-hospital and Emergency Care Group.
Declarations
Conflicts Of Interests
The Authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.
Funding
This research received no specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.
Registration
No registration applicable.
Data availability statement
No new data were created or analyzed in this study. Data sharing is not applicable to this article.
Ethical approval
Ethical approval for this study was not required.

Most read articles by the same author(s)

Latest articles

Loading articles...

Indexing Information

Loading...

PoEM News

Loading news...

Partnership

Loading...

Journal Metrics

Loading...

Meet the Board

Support for Authors

1

Getting Started

Register with journal and receive Author role. Access dashboard to begin new submission.
2

Complete Submission

Select language, title, section • Enter abstract, keywords, references • Upload files • Add co-authors
3

Review & Submit

Add optional comments for editors and suggest reviewers. Review all information and confirm submission.

Submitted

Your submission is complete and under review

Published

Article successfully published
8

Copyediting

Review copyedited files and publication-ready versions. Provide feedback or approval through discussions.
7

Acceptance

Accepted manuscripts proceed to copyediting and production. Receive confirmation notifications.
6

Upload Revised

Upload revised files through Review tab with response to reviewers (if revisions required).
5

Peer Review

Receive editor's decision via email and dashboard.
4

Track Submission

Monitor submission status via Author Dashboard.

Support for Reviewers

1

Receive Invitation

Editors send invitation via email with manuscript details. Access via link or journal login.
2

Request Details

Click to access assignment details including article title, abstract, review files, and schedule.
3

Accept / Decline

Review submission details and privacy statement. Decide whether to accept or decline the assignment.
4

Read Guidelines

Review journal's specific reviewer guidelines. Guidelines remain accessible throughout the review process.
5

Review Manuscript

Download review files and conduct thorough review. Enter comments for editor and author.

Complete

Review successfully submitted
9

Submit Review

When satisfied with review and recommendation click Submit. Confirm submission to complete the process.
8

Communicate

Use Review Discussion panel to ask questions. Click Add discussion to start conversation.
7

Recommendation

Select recommendation from dropdown menu based on review: Accept, Revisions, Resubmit, or Decline.
6

Upload Files

Optionally upload marked-up copy of review file. Remember to anonymize if required by type.
PoEM Footer